Mark Grimm

 

Ron Paul Clash with CNN’s Borger: Where Both Erred

Both GOP presidential contender Ron Paul and CNN interviewer Gloria Borger could have handled their controversial interview differently. Paul ended the interview after repeated questions about racist newsletters distributed under Paul’s name about 20 years ago.

Here’s an edited tape of the interview:

Even if you feel he was badgered, by ending the interview, Paul brings more attention to the story, which is something that doesn’t help him. He also was inconsistent with his answers. He initially said, “on occasion, yes,” he did read the newsletters, yet he later said I “never read that stuff.”

As for Borger, persistence is an admirable trait in journalism, but you have to know where the line is between persistence and badgering. She crossed it. Even in this edited version (we didn’t get to see the entire interview), Paul answered the question three times — “didn’t write them, disavow them.” Paul was correct when he said, “you got the answer.” Paul answered the question, Borger just didn’t like the answer she was getting. There’s a difference.

Watching the interview, do you have any question in your mind what Borger thinks of Paul? That should not be so obvious in a reporter. She even said, “come on” to him. which is an evaluation not a question. This is another reason, by the way, reporters like Borger should not be giving their opinions on talk shows about the people they are covering.

Mr. Paul should have been more consistent and finished the interview. Annoying interviews go with the territory. Though Ms. Borger deserves some initial credit for persistence, she eventually let your own agenda slip in. Her job is to inquire, not evaluate. Both should learn from the experience and so should everyone watching.

The writer is a former TV anchor/reporter, current media consultant and adjunct media professor.
http://markgrimm.com/

Please share this with someone who may be interested.

Mitt’s $10,000 Mistake: Ammunition for the Class Warfare Crowd

GOP presidential contender Mitt Romney offered to bet opponent Gov. Rick Perry $10,000 over a dispute involving Romney’s book. Who makes $10,000 bets? This debate moment will be rerun a thousand times by Obama loyalists who are counting on class warfare to re-elect the president.

In the midst of the Occupy Wall Street movement, Romney is vulnerable on the “Fat Cat” issue because of his wealth. The size of the bet makes Romney appear out of touch with working Americans, many of whom spend three months trying to earn that much. The fact Romney didn’t see that is a blind spot he must address…soon.

Substantively, of course, Romney’s experience and his plans to fix the economy so working people can actually find good jobs should carry far more weight in the battle for the presidency. And Obama’s class warfare strategy is due to the problem his record of high unemployment and runaway debt cannot really be defended. But debate moments matter —- like Gore’s sighs, Bush 41 checking his watch, and Rick Lazio invading Hillary’s space. Romney has to respond by showing “he gets it.”

Any bets he can do it successfully?

The writer is a political consultant, elected official, and public speaking coach.

Please share this post with anyone who might be interested.

Cincy Hoop Brawl: Real Black Eyes Come in Press Conference

“We’ve got a whole bunch of gangsters in the locker room…We went out there and zipped them up.” —- Xavier player Tu Holloway

The post-game press conference by two Xavier hoop players gave two black eyes to the university after a terrible on-court brawl ended their game with bitter crosstown rival Cincinnati.

The fight was messy enough where a cheap shot by a Cincy player bloodied the face of a Xavier player. You would think both universities would have moved quickly to defuse the situation. Didn’t happen. Then came the press conference.

Xavier senior Tu Holloway defended their actions by saying, “We’ve got a whole bunch of gangsters in the locker room…We went out there and zipped them up.” I doubt these were reassuring comments for the Jesuits who run the university. Throwing more grease on the fire, teammate Mark Lyons said, “Where we from, you’re going to do something back.” He later added, “We just proved…We a tough team…We ain’t scared of nobody.”

Perfect role models for our kids.

Xavier coach Chris Mack said of the pair, “At times, they probably don’t represent themselves with their use of words real well.” And given that, coach, no one at Xavier thought it was a bad idea to send these players out to the press? Penn State, Syracuse, and now, Xavier. Is this “Shoot-Yourself-in-the-Foot-Season? If so, I didn’t get the brochure.

It will take a while to sort out who was at fault during the fight — video watching, referee interviews, league officials’ pow wows. But, in some ways, the aftermath presents a bigger problem. How far reaching in college sports is the culture reflected in the press conference?

Those wounds will be tougher to heal.

The writer is a crisis communication professional, adjunct media professor, and former play-by-play announcer for college basketball.

Please share this post with anyone who might be interested.

Trump As Debate Moderator? Get Real!

Donald Trump hosting a GOP presidential debate may seem like a bad joke, but the joke will be on any presidential contender who participates in this farce on December 27th.

Trump has already “played the media” for far more publicity than he ever deserved regarding the presidential race. Yes, the media is drawn to colorful characters because they attract viewers and readers, but why would any serious presidential candidate take part in the Trump show? As long as we have body bags coming back from Afghanistan and Iraq and nine percent unemployment, we can agree the presidency is serious business. Pandering to Donald Trump will make any Republican candidate look weak and lessen the chances any one of them will beat Barack Obama next year.

One might ask, “What exactly are Trump’s journalistic credentials?” Is highlighting fights between Omarosa and anyone else who comes near her one of them? To their credit, contenders Ron Paul and Jon Huntsman have refused to take part in the Trump debate. Trump responded by calling Paul a “clown-like candidate.” A Paul spokesman said, “the selection of a reality television personality to host a presidential debate that voters nationwide will be watching is beneath the office of the Presidency and flies in the face of that office’s history and dignity.”

Who’s the clown?

The writer is a Republican elected official and political consultant.

Please share this blog with anyone you think may be interested.

Lesson Learned: SU Coach Boeheim May Have Saved Job

I told Syracuse radio station WSYR Thursday I thought Syracuse University Coach Jim Boeheim’s disastrous press conference Tuesday put his job in jeopardy and he needed to do a few things immediately to recover. The next day, Coach Boeheim may have saved his job with his new response.

This development offers us a valuable lesson in crisis communication. I’d like to break it down to make it a more instructive experience. Here’s what I felt was needed and what Coach Boeheim did:

1-Grimm on Thursday:
Coach Boeheim must apologize by saying he made a big mistake when he verbally attacked the alleged victims and should have waited to all the facts were in.
Boeheim on Friday:
“I believe I misspoke very badly in my response to the allegations that have been made. I shouldn’t have questioned what the accusers expressed or their motives. I am really sorry that I did that and I regret any harm I caused.”

2-Grimm on Thursday:
I said the coach’s misguided loyalty was harmful because he had a higher duty to ensure no stone was left unturned to protect children.
Boeheim on Friday:
“What I said last week was out of loyalty. I reacted without thinking. I couldn’t believe what I was hearing. I’m trying to learn from my mistake.”

3-Grimm on Thursday:
Coach Boeheim should have sought prior professional communication help and not relied on just a friend to help him prepare Tuesday’s remarks.
Boeheim on Friday:
“I have talked to some people today and yesterday about what I was going to say. These are my thoughts. I am not good enough to put them down on paper. I just am not.”

4-Grimm on Thursday:
Once the coach apologizes, he should not say anything else until all the facts are in.
Boeheim on Friday:
“That’s all I can say. There is an investigation going on which I fully support because we all need to know as much as we can what happened.”

I believe Coach Boeheim’s contrition was genuine. His Friday press conference went a long way to reverse the damage from his previous statements. As an SU alum, I was glad to see it. As a rookie sportscaster in 1980, Coach Boeheim was considerate and respectful to me. It was a genuine kindness I have not forgotten.

Ultimately, the coach’s fate will be decided on what the investigation uncovers, namely, did he have any knowledge of what happened, and even if he didn’t, how was it he didn’t know on his watch? For now, those questions remain unanswered. But for the moment, he remains doing what he does best, coaching the Orange.

Note: The writer, a former TV anchor and adjunct Siena journalism professor, received his master’s degree in public communications from the Newhouse School at Syracuse University in 1979.
Please share this blog with those that might be interested
.

Black Eye for the Orange: Coach Boeheim’s Self Inflicted Wound

Misguided loyalty has placed Syracuse University hoop coach Jim Boeheim’s job in jeopardy and given a black eye to the university.

Boeheim’s self inflicted wound occurred last week when he said alleged sex abuse victims were liars involving the case of his assistant, Bernie Fine. However, Fine was fired just a few days later and Boeheim said he supported the dismissal.

In most cases, standing by an old friend would be admired. But Boeheim had a higher duty, to leave no stone unturned to ensure no abuse of children ever took place under his watch. He now insists it is inappropriate to comment on the case “until the investigation is complete.” If only he had followed his own advice last week.

We don’t know all the facts yet. But we do know Syracuse officials feel they knew enough to fire Fine. In any case, the Penn State and Syracuse cases are stunning examples of poor crisis communication. Both failed to uncover the full stories on their crisis years before and both failed to brush aside personal loyalties and devotion to sports programs to reveal the full extent of the damage done. I wonder if more revelations from other universities lie ahead. Do you?

Note: The writer received his master’s degree in public communications from the Newhouse School at Syracuse University in 1979.

Please share this blog with those that might be interested.